A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst prospective neighbours about the construction of a wall at a coastal web-site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide interest adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental problems, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Instances report about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development performs at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, look for to construct their family members home. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, in which advancement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining produced by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their setting up permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries in their site, resulting in an encroachment with a Specific Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such regions are issue to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological implications, notably in a sensitive coastal natural environment such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their scheduling permission, and say the wall, that is partially designed, is in the proper posture. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, wherever sights of the sea are the two hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-substantial water throughout a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, an image which includes considering the fact that develop into emblematic in the intensity with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible proof on the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Times described, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the h2o for the duration of severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the internet site became One of the more hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these kinds of steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was staying encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become greatly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court read further submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute while in the authorized timeline.
On the core from the dispute is often a disagreement in excess of boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep the wall, as manufactured, goes further than what was authorised and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has actually been called meticulous in his examination of planning paperwork, maps, and situations attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is determined by concern for environmental defense and adherence to setting up law. They reject claims that the case is about preserving a private see, insisting rather that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have explained their extensive-standing link to the realm and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple simply endeavoring to make a loved ones house in accordance Together with the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches on the Unique Area of Conservation and say that each one functions have already been performed depending on Skilled guidance and authorized plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the extraordinary actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as moving into the sea for the duration of a storm, do not alter the fundamental points.
The case has also elevated broader questions on how scheduling disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over construction of wall at coastal web-site has become a shorthand description to get a predicament that a lot of observers see as more and more frequent. As sea concentrations rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation involving personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has become extra contentious.
The Irish Periods short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from pretty distinct Qualified backgrounds can find themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have grown to be synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded by means of waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both of those the physical reality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The courtroom need to establish if the wall as developed complies with arranging permission and no matter if any encroachment right into a Specific Spot of Conservation has occurred. The authorized arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and organizing problems. Nonetheless the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who need to Reside alongside one another extended after the lawful charges have already been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction will work at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, although the implications of the case increase over and Irish Times article about accountant Paul Feely above that address. For planners, developers, and residents alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. Additionally, it underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for instance environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre of your dispute stands partially created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter if it'll eventually be altered, taken off, or completed as planned will depend on the court docket’s findings. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably continue on to look in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more intently watched planning disputes in north Dublin in recent times.